Monday, August 31, 2015

Coffee!

I believe that if the Narrator's sat down and discussed their pieces with one another they would agree to a certain extent because they both expressed a personal opinion and or experience. Although both are different in different ways such as time period and personal experience. they both sought out to educate. to teach a lesson better yet to show the importance of words. I strongly believe that both narrators would share stories and their common goals which may turn out to be the same. I believe that although one is based on personal struggle and the other is based  on struggles as a race both outline the importance of positivity and the effects of negativity. Both articles take a common problem and incorporate it into their own personal story. Although they might have a little conflict deciding what coffee is best. Their stories both outline some important key factors such as words, connotations, human impact and the importance of not judging without prior knowledge of that person. Both stories had a common goal of self realization. in which I believe both accomplished. So in conclusion I believe that they would both have a nice discussion on the roots of the ideas and their responses. they might even drop a flame Speech together who knows!

1 comment:

  1. I completely agree with what you have said about both of these authors! I believe they both see the element of gaining more knowledge and power but express it in two different ways. These two personal stories made for a good “life lesson” if you take anything away from them. They are telling you how to express positivity and with delicate word choices to show your intellect and knowledge of this world. I also believe they both try to teach their lesson of thinking either out of the box, or just thinking in a different mind set to make sure you understand all the views that could be there.

    ReplyDelete